-- Advertisement --

Roe v. Wade - 37 Years Later

Almost four decades later, the debate on abortion continues
abortion protest

January 29 marked an important day in the history of reproductive rights for women, as well as for women’s rights in general. It marked the 37th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark case Rose v. Wade. The court’s decision passed by a seven to two majority, deeming abortion a fundamental right under the United States Constitution and subjecting all laws attempting to restrict it to a strict standard of scrutiny.

Ever since this ruling, Roe v. Wade has been a constant source of debate. There have been many attempts to reverse te ruling the 37 years since it has passed. The law, along with reproductive rights in general have been twisted and tested in those years as well.

In 1976 the Hyde Amendment passed into law, which prohibited the use of any Medicaid funds to cover abortions. Abortions were still legal, but they could not be paid for by any government-funded system.
One of the biggest issues that has continued to evolve and varies from state to state is at what point in a pregnancy can a woman have an abortion. In the 1992 case Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the trimester framework in Roe v. Wade. This made it legal for states to prohibit abortions after the point of fetal viability, except in instances that would risk the woman's health.

The issue of trimester framework continued into 2003 when the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act was signed into law by President George W. Bush. Despite being challenged in three appeals courts in 2007, the Supreme Court upheld the ban.

Last spring the country showed how sensitive they were to the issue of Roe v. Wade and late term abortions when Dr. George Tiller, one of the few doctors who performed the procedure, was shot outside his church on Sunday morning. Soon after some states passed laws saying that women attempting to have an abortion would be forced to have an ultrasound and hear the heartbeat first.

Ohio even attempted to pass a law that would force women to obtain permission from the father before having an abortion.

In the 37 years since the passing of Roe v. Wade, especially in recent years the debate regarding the legality of a women’s right to choose has continued to be one of the most debated topics in the country. And though attempts have been made time and time again, none have succeeded in reversing the decision.

 
COMMENTS & DISCUSSION (5) COMMENTS
Tom Cook
Feb. 23, 2010
02:30 PM EST
Difficult moral issue; simple rational conclusion: woman's decision. Word: No one has the right to make decisions over a woman's body. Keep your nose out of her womb.

Sue Sillavan
Feb. 23, 2010
02:30 PM EST
I am a Christian and I beleive all of the Bible. One of the comandments is, "Thou shall not kill" I beleive life begans with comseption, so therefore abortion is killing. God did not give mankind the right to kill. I also am a Reg. Nurse, and in my medical feild, I am even more convenced , abortion is killing.

Michael Sullivan
Feb. 23, 2010
02:30 PM EST
Aggrandizing the power of the Constitution is in direct contradiction with its' purpose. The document was drafted as a guide to only what our government COULD do. Once the Bill of Rights was argued and included, hypocrisy was introduced by outlining what our government could NOT do. Invaluable as the addition was, it set a precedent that further distorted the effectiveness of the Constitution by allowing amendments that grant or restrict rights that were previously unrestricted by it. Alexander Hamilton said it best, "All rights not specifically restricted in it are unilaterally granted by it." In our government, no matter the opinion of the majority, no one person should see any right infringed. In case you intend to call my beliefs into question with nonsense monikers such as "baby-killer" or the Neo-cons current favorite, "socialist", let me put your fears to rest. I believe that life begins the moment that a cell first multiplies forming the vesca pisces. Yet, logically, one must admit that the easiest way to preserve a right of his own is to defend those of others, regardless of beliefs.

Ernest Toseland
Feb. 23, 2010
02:30 PM EST
The woman has the choise to have sex and can do what she wants with her body. Once she acts on her right and gets pragent there are many others that should have input. These include the dad, grandparents extanded family and the goverment that should protect the weak from the impowered. It is a matter of civil-rights. The little person that has not had any choise must be protected unless they will kill the mom. Abortion should never be allowed as a form of conterception. The women can chose sex, she should not be able to murder to avoid the consequences of that choise.

PJ
Feb. 23, 2010
02:30 PM EST
Abortion should be banned for life unless women are in grave danger of giving birth, or are raped. OOPS I DID IT AGAIN IS NOTHING MORE THAN REPEATED MURDER. Accidents don't just happen. The answer is birth control, cross you're leggs and just say no!!

Share your thoughts on the story by adding your comments below. Comments containing profanity, derogatory language, or any form of advertisement will not be approved. Comments will be reviewed by the site's editorial team, so your post may not appear for up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.

POST YOUR RESPONSE
 
 
Balance of Power

Track the United States government with updates on the three branches of government.

The Issues