-- Advertisement --

Public Opinion Supports New Proposal in Health Care Reform

Polling shows support for a public insurance entity option
Obama health care

A recent poll shows that most Americans believe at least one central idea in President Obama’s push to change the status of health care delivery in America is a good one. Seventy-two percent of Americans nationwide have embraced the notion that a public health insurance option would help reform the insurance side of the problem. There are some crucial details still to be resolved, but a “public plan” would allow people to choose to buy insurance from a public entity instead of the traditional private insurers such as Blue Cross and Aetna.

The President has touted this idea because it brings competition to the insurance marketplace, potentially forcing private insurers to provide better service for less cost in order to compete for customers.

Critics say the popularity of the public plan could drive private insurers out of business, leaving only the public option and little competition in the end. For this reason a crucial question is whether the public insurance entity will have to play by the same rules as private insurers – such as balancing its books – or if it will be subsidized by the federal government. Insurance companies are lobbying hard against any kind of a public plan and Republicans in Congress have refused to consider the idea up until now. However, polling showing popular support for the plan and belief that Democrats have better ideas on health care reform could change the Republican position. The New York Times/CBS poll found that 57 percent of those polled thought Democrats would do a better job making changes to health care, including 25 percent of Republican respondents.

Another idea being pushed by Democrats is to increase the government subsidies for health care insurance for the 45 million Americans who are uninsured. The use of emergency facilities and payment by federal and state governments and hospitals is expensive and inefficient. While providing insurance to those who cannot afford may be costly, this also has public support, according to the poll. A majority of respondents said they would support higher taxes to pay for insurance coverage for the uninsured.

President Obama has stated that he supports increasing the number of Americans who are insured, but he intends to pay for it by making other cuts in the overall budget. This should keep health care reform from stalling because of the debate on deficits. In fact, the savings from decreasing the use of emergency room care where a simple doctor's visit is all that is required and from increasing access to preventative case such as annual check-ups will be substantial. These reforms can save money in the long run.

 
COMMENTS & DISCUSSION (28) COMMENTS
Amy Trierweiler
Jun. 23, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
People need to understand that as long as the insurance companies are still influencing the outcome it will be an outcome that is to their benefit. Unless all people in all health conditions are allowed to have equal coverage, there is no true reform. I am an independent insurance agent who just got an individual plan for a business owner who had two knee surgeries. He is fully recovered and more than a year out on both knee surgeries, but not only did the insurance company restrict coverage for the most recently operated on knee, but they will not cover him if he ever gets arthritis ANYWHERE in his body. As long as the insurance companies are allowed to do this they will continue to carve out insurance coverage that minimizes their risk. Until health coverage is considered a right and not a privledge in this country we will not see a truly 'reformed' health care system.

Bruce Cerrone
Jun. 23, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
I have never known Government to run any Program or Agency without such Beauracratic Inadequacy that the Public is not infierated at them, Motor vheicles, Welfare, Social Security, Unemployment for a few examples...So what makes the People think Health Care will be any different...

David Westall
Jun. 23, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
I am all for Health care reform. However, 40% or more of the people and cost of this system will go towards Illegal Immigrants the Administration plans on granting Amnesty to. That means $400-800 Billion of the cost of this program will be placed on the backs of working class Americans. Thirteen Million Illegal Immigrants were deported after WW2 to make jobs for returning Veterans. The same thing should happen now to make jobs for unemployed Americans and keep the cost of this new Health Care Plan more reasonable. Americans will be footing the bill for it, Americans should be the only ones receiving benefits from it.

peter nemeth
Jun. 23, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
This poll was done by the New York Times and had a disproportionate amount of people who voted for Obama so it does not fairly represent the opinion of the american people as the headline suggests!

Ray Gutoski
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
If we can't solve this problem...the problem of tens of millions of people in the "richest country in the world" going without health insurance, and some older people having to choose between medicine and food- or people going bankrupt to pay medical bills etc etc... but we can glorify a culture of excessive consumption and the life styles of the rich and famous...defining this as "the American Dream" ...then something is deeply wrong with our values.,

Henry Butler
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
This is bull. A federal plan would be priced cheaper in order to get everyone to eventually abandon private health insurance. After that happens we'll have only federal health care which will become a financial black hole like all other federal programs. If you want real health care reform, ban group policies. Make insurance companies market directly to the individual. It's worked in other markets. No one buys cars, homes, food, clothing, etc. through a group plan.

Slav2009
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
Sorry but the notion doesn't fly. The only way this can work is for the Feds to put private insurance out of business. The real crux of the entire problem is malpractice costs. To prevent being sued, every physician must now have extra and frequently unnecessary testing tp bak up every diagnosis. Throw in that modern medicine typically addresses symptoms and not cures. All as a result of the greed of trial lawyers. What we need yo solve the problem of spiraling costs are two things: a cap on non-economic damages and tort reform, But then the Democrats would be goring the ox of their biggest campaign contributors.

norine lucino
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
I think it cost to much and their not telling how much it would be

Bertha Reddick
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
I think the democrats and republicans need to get behind the president and think about the people for a change, and less about themselves getting re-elected. What they don't realize is that if they do their job for the public, the public will take care of them. They don't need the lobbyist. Some people have a $2000 deductible on their health insurance. That's a shame. I also support a public option. I do so wish the democrats would show some back bone.

Bob
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
What this story fails to reveal is that in the NYT/CBS poll the of the people polled (48%) supported Obama and identified as liberal/left of center, while only 32% supported McCain and the remainder supported others or had no opinion. This is known as a biased poll. The truth of this plan is that a "public option" will result in the elimination of the private insurance and usher in the single payer system. What business woul;d elect to pay for an employee health plan when a "government plan" is available. And if you believe that a government backed plan will not be subsidized I have a bridge to seel (once my stimulus money builds it).

carmine siciliano
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
I think the idear is wrong

PJ Griffin
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
I am tired of paying for all the fraudently disabled (and you know there are millions of them bilking the health medicaid system that comes out of my hard earned paycheck) As a hard workng 51 yr. old Nuses Aide, I limp out of work every day between sciatica and low back pain. Meanwhile just where the heck does chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia play into america"s #1 dissability? They can't work but can whip out there trusty little handicapped car flags,and spend the whole day shopping at the mall? So Handicapped my butt. It's a bloody disgrace what these people get away with. Hire a task force and you'll see just how much the government wastes on healthcare for the poor and dissabled. The poor always having the money for beer and ciggarretts, but not enough to feed their children? I am just sick about it!!!

Bill Diller
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
This is the minimum that I hope for. I personally would like to see a national single payer system. However, the Republicans are such obstructionists these days that seems like a no sale. I have mine and to hell with the rest of you! Short of that I support the public option to keep the pressure on the insurance companies. We need to control costs for many reasons. Our industries are at a disadvantage and 46 million of us are without coverage. I wish we could get rid of the profit motive in health care and do more in preventative care as well. Why should health care be based on whether you can afford it? Is this some sort of a financial triage system? I'm am so weary of listening to talking heads in suits trying to act like they care, but of course few do. We in America deserve a health care system that works for everyone.

Paying High Rates
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
I'd rather have the government standing between my doctor and me than a for profit insurance carrier like we have now standing between me and affordable health care.

mike
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
Although I agree with some of the basic ideas, it is in the details that make me worried. I fear that the insurance lobbyist are already working with their congressional bedfellows right now. Working out a sweet deal in which the government will take the most prone to sickness citizens and they will take the cream of the crop, healthy ones. I don't trust either side. I have an idea, lets use the health insurance company that our senators and congressnmen use!

J. Russo
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
We need to be able to make health insurance affordable for all who want it. I worry that the government with make things worse with high taxes and rationing. We will lose the quality of care if bureaucrats interfere with the physician/patient relationship. There must also be provisions to protect the patient's right to use alternative and natural remedies. Many of them work better and cheaper that "establishment" treatments. For those who think socialized medicine is a good thing, take a look at how government screws up the other industries and programs it is already involved in. Also look at England and Canada's socialized medicine. Parts of their system is actually good. But people must wait a long time and the quality and choice of care is not nearly as good as in the US. We need tort reform and leaner taxes and regulations to improve our healthcare system and lower costs.

Denzil D'souza
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
My small company in Ma. was forced into this type of socialized health care . The fisrt time my employee used the emergency room for kidney stones , after numerous so called "tests"s my insurance company was billed 6,900.00 . When he questioned the outrageous bill he was told that all he owed was 235.00 and the rest was to be paid by the insurance carrier ./ He was also told the cost was so high because it helps pay for the uninsured illegal aliens that were in the emergency waiting room. This is what its all about , folks ! Get used to it or dump Deval & the rest of the liberal democrat bums in 2010

Name Sandra George
Jun. 24, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
I do not trust the government to run anything. If they make a public plan, it will only wind up a screwed up mess as Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare are now. Yet they are asking us to trust them with our health care. I don't think so! If Mr. Obama is really serious about "reforming" health care, he would consider tort reform and lifting some of the mandates that make insurance more expensive than it needs to be.

Tom
Jun. 25, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
I understand this poll by the NY Times was responded to by 72% Obama supporters and about 20% McCain supporters. A fact you really should include with this story. But you are not alone, it's been copied by most of the mainstream media.

darla
Jun. 25, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
no way not by this govment look how good there run all the heath zars cars zars pay zars ans all that money the printed to pay for thing we need a new pan but but from our govment the need out of our heath plans just my thought god bless the usa and all our real frineds arould the world

Peter Nemeth
Jun. 25, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
NO what people need to understand is that if we reform our health care system the way Obama wants we will get a system that will have to ration health care and we will be faced with long waiting periods Just look to the UK, Canada, France etc. This plan will bankrupt our fragile economy we can not pay for and sustain a federal health care plan that is open to every person within our boarders. We can't even pay for social security and Medicaid and now Obama wants to add another multi trillion dollar entitlement to the backs of the American taxpayers. I say no to this kind of change! Yes we need reform in the health care field but the ideas being floated by Obama won't work; wait I'm wrong they can work but it would mean having book keepers and bureaucrats decide who gets medical care and who gets sent home to DIE!! NO THIS IS NOT CHANGE WE WANT OR CAN AFFORD TO SUSTAIN!!!

Betty Mulvihill
Jul. 08, 2009
11:30 AM EDT
Something has got to be done about the private health insurance companies. The reason I say this is because mu son purchased dental insurance thru Aetna and it took 2 months to kick in and then it does not pay anything except 2 x a year clenings. He needs serious dental work. He has no health insurance and he is in school. His job does not give any benefits. These insurance companies are basically ripping people off. That is just not right.

Rick Liles
Jul. 21, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
Ask the Canadians how they like the health care plan they are saddled with; it is basically exactly what is being proposed by the administration. It does not work and we the American middle class will end up bearing the burden. This idea of spend, spend, spend money we do not have is going to create tremendous problems in the near future. America has better wake up or the government will control EVERYTHING including our thinking (hate crimes legislation) and we will all wonder where our liberty went.

MARY RAINEY
Nov. 11, 2009
11:00 AM EST
HEY RICK, OBAMAS PLAN DOESN'T EVEN RESEMBLE THE CANADIANS. THE NEED FOR PRIVATE PROFIT IS ABSENT IN THEIR SYSTEM WHICH IS PRECISELY WHT IT DOES WORK. YES, I DO TALK TO CANADIANS DAILY AND MOST BY A LARGE MAJORITY ARE HAPPY WITH THEIR PLAN. YOU DON'T KNOW ANY MORE ABOUT ABOUT UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE THAN MOST AMERICANS, EVEN THE ONES WHO WANT IT DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT IT IS. SAD BECAUSE BETWEEN THE IGNORANT AND THE SELECTIVE IGNORANCE THE TRUTH BECOMES UN NECESSARILY MUDDLED. YOUR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE AND FEAR MONGERING WILL CONTINUE TO LEAD MANY MORE HUMAN LIVES TO A EARLY GRAVE. GET INFORMED OR SHUT UP!! THAT GOES FOR THE REST OF THE OPPOSITION!

vernon
Nov. 30, 2009
10:45 AM EST
i find it hard to believe that peopl;e want this inefficent govrenment running your health care. when you find out what youve got it will be to late to go back.all you loder people who support this when you get sick and cant get help dont blame the govt blame your self for supporting this

vernon
Nov. 30, 2009
11:00 AM EST
hey mary obama dosent have a plan this is pelosi and reed doing this

Grace
Nov. 30, 2009
11:15 AM EST
That poll is bullshit. The poll must have been worded poorly.

Ralph B
Feb. 23, 2010
02:31 PM EST
How can people favor a public option they do not understand? See if the poll holds up once real reforms have been proposed. Insurance is the most heavily regulated industry in this country. What we do not like about insurance companies is directly tie to the governments that regulate them. If you want change, then change the rules and regulations accordingly. Include universal covergare, base plans, workman comp reform, tort reform, auto insuraance liability.

Share your thoughts on the story by adding your comments below. Comments containing profanity, derogatory language, or any form of advertisement will not be approved. Comments will be reviewed by the site's editorial team, so your post may not appear for up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.

POST YOUR RESPONSE
 
 
Balance of Power

Track the United States government with updates on the three branches of government.

The Issues