-- Advertisement --

President Obama Battles Fox News

Is the media overplaying its role in politics?

In the last week there have been a few stories that dominated the headlines that struck a chord with me. One was the president and his administration's remarks regarding FOX News. The other was the infamous Balloon Boy story. By now, you may be asking what do those two stories have anything to do with the other and why exactly did they strike me?

Regarding Fox News, I would like to say that I am a liberal, but I am an American first, and I know the difference between news reporting and political punditry. I love good political punditry, even if I don’t agree with it. However, there is a time and place for it, and it should never be confused with actual news journalism. News is not biased. News is not based on opinion. News consists of the facts - nothing more, nothing less.

My problem with Fox News is not as much about the opinions that they strew about but the fact that they report their opinions as news when they are clearly people stating an opinion. The line between reporting the news and discussing opinion is never made clear as Fox news weaves in and out of the two genres.

With that being said, other major networks may not work as hard to define that line either. Rachel Maddow is no more a news anchor than Glenn Beck is. Both are political pundits, not news anchors. My biggest beef with most cable news networks is that they don’t clearly define the difference and too many Americans fail to realize that there even is a difference.

Personally, I prefer my own local news channels where dishing out political opinion is still taboo and reporting the facts is the task at hand with no time for opinions. Or else I watch Congress in session on C-Span, where I can watch without the middle man and decide for myself what’s going on in Washington.

There is a line that has been crossed since the popularity of cable news networks and the president has every right to have strong feelings against Fox News. But picking a fight with them kind goes against everything children are taught in grade school. Showing the bullies that they got you worked up is letting them win. Ignoring them and pretending they aren’t there is what drives them crazy.

I had the opportunity to see the president speak last week and he did jokingly mention the dangers of cable news. He didn’t mention any network specifically, but instead referred to cable news in general. That’s a warning we should all take to heart.

A prime example of this is the fact that while the country is in such a fragile state, all the cable networks can drop everything to cover a boy in a balloon. It turned out that the boy was not actually be in a balloon but his family had orchestrated the prank in hopes of obtaining their own reality TV show.

We allow the media to feed us this stuff, which is why they keep doing it. Reports are showing that Glenn Beck’s ratings are increasing dramatically. But in a world where Jon & Kate Plus 8 can attract 10.6 million viewers in one night, do ratings really mean anything other than that American public will watch anything cable television puts on TV?

I saw something on Twitter that described my feelings perfectly. It stated that it was not so much the fact that a family perpetrated a hoax about a boy in a balloon, but that for an afternoon the entire country was distracted by a shiny object in the sky.

My advice for true news coverage? Read the AP wire and stuck with PBS. And shut off the cable box.

 
COMMENTS & DISCUSSION (35) COMMENTS
John E Vawter Sr
Oct. 22, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
The Comments By Harvey Are 100% Fact. In The Past Comments Were Marked Editorial Views Not Necessary Reflecting The Views Of The Station Or Network. I Would Like To Here Thoughts As To Why "African" Precedes American. I Thought We Were 100% Americans That Is Unless One Is Not A U.S.A. Citizen?

Butch Babuzhka
Oct. 22, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
AP and PBS for true news coverage??? No way.

Tina
Oct. 22, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
You would think they would have better things to do. They just cant stand the fact that there are people out here who just don't agree with them. Fox news is right on ,I can always get the thruth there.They also need to get it out there that they are totally ignoring the proposed 28th amendment,I am sure alot of people don't even know about it. I guess they think we don't keep up on things like that. It just goes to show how much they lie and deceive. I am just a concerned citizen who eveyday watch and see this country being destroyed by a bunch of morons Thank you..

John Anderson
Oct. 22, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
You definitely will not get an accurate report from AP, nor from PBS sadly to say. Their commentary, more ttimes than not is from liberals only. You have to dig deeper than these two sources for a balanced report.

msskt
Oct. 22, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
When you speak of news with out a point of view, do you mean something like Charlie Gibson, ABC when he ask Gov. Palin what her views were about the 6 Doctrines of Bush? Actually, there were 8 but hey we learned some time ago not to rely on the accuratacy of ABC. Here is the real issue, networks are typically liberal. There are employees of the news departments bailing out of the networks to go to FOX. What is disturbing is the fact that one Fox is more conservative, and is being attacted. CNN. ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC have let the Amercian Public down, they have no investigation of the programs of the Obama administration, we are being mislead, and lied to by the Administration, and the news media whom we have relied on for years to give the facts are not even looking into what we are being told by the Administration. So yes many of us have turned to FOX who at least makes some attempt to be more balanced.

Russo
Oct. 22, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
I am a conservative [not a neo-con]. I think we need to protect everyone's constitutional right to free speach, free thought and the freedom to be safe in one's home and with one's personal papers. I see a very disturbing trend in the media and politics wherein people's character is assassinated for expressing their views. I also object to the way cable news shows have arguements between guests on their shows. It gets very nerve wracking to try to hear what one person is saying while another panelist talks over them. The same thing is now happening on The Insider entertainment show. It is rude and confusing. News should be reported in a straightforward manner with dignified announcers. Commentary should be labeled as such so people can distinguish between them. Commentators like Rush Limbaugh, Hannity and Glen Beck have a valid point of view. But we must also realize their core neo-con roots. Rachel Maddow is a leftist and people must understand where she is coming from too. That way balanced decisions can be made by the listener.

Tom cook
Oct. 22, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
You very egregiously cannot detect who is a bully; the thing in our White House is the most open, cowardly bully to ever present in the political arena. A hideously narcissistic schoolyard bully without the slightest bit of adult self-control, responsibility, or intellectual capacity, our incredibly insignificant little communist community organizer: Barry Sotero.

Jon Phillips
Oct. 22, 2009
01:30 PM EDT
Your comments are no different than Fox News or the liberal media it is all parisiting from the people. Lets get on with the important things like winning in Afghanistan or getting out of there. The real news is that Obama is incompetent as a Leader.

Mplspug
Oct. 22, 2009
01:30 PM EDT
Maddow and Beck should not even be in the same sentence where anchor is used. People some how are unable to distinguish between cable news networks and actual news. Cable network news are nothing more than political entertainment between the 5 minutes of real news they deliver on the half hour. As for local news, be careful, there are a lot of subjective points thrown in there as well. I pay carefull attention to the words anchors and reports use.

sailorman
Oct. 22, 2009
01:45 PM EDT
If it was not for Fox News would we ever heard of Van Jones or Acorn . Why did all the outher news outlets not cover it for atleast a week.

Judith Mahler
Oct. 22, 2009
01:45 PM EDT
I am in complete agreement . The hoax was a waste of time and energy and deceptive. There should be contols and rules set for cable news. The American public is too vulnerable.

CW
Oct. 22, 2009
01:45 PM EDT
I believe your comments are right on. Too much us against them going on. With all the spin it's hard to get at the real truth.

Sylvester Billups
Oct. 22, 2009
01:45 PM EDT
The president shouldn't have to battle with any news station, they are talking about freedom of speech, have they ever heard of mutiny because that is all the news media is committing is mutiny when they report onesided stories, and get the people believing these stories. They are committing mutiny, I know people have the right to believe what they want to but do the media have the right to put bad ideas into people minds and then try to influence them on goverment wrongdoing. you know what I'm saying got to go

Pat
Oct. 22, 2009
01:45 PM EDT
"In a world were Jon & Kate Plus 8 can attract 10.6 million viewers" Its the same world that elected Obama. Its the same world that says the congress has an approval rating of 13 percent yet returns incumbents over 90 percent of the time. Megan, just sit back and enjoy the bread a circus, you can't handle the truth.

William Deburrs
Oct. 22, 2009
01:45 PM EDT
Politics as ussual, most Government Agencies do all types of things in order two make News, for this do not surprise me at all, can you give me something more usualful to talk about like the Asst. Dist Attorney Johnson of the Queens County Court that was selling drugs from the Court room, or the Asst. Dist. Atytorney Norman Archier whom was in charge of the Queens Grand Jury, whom took a gun out of the Court room and threw it away, or the Cover-up of the Murder cases by the New York Attorney General , and the Governor of New York concerning the Murder xcasess that was sold out of the New York Country District Attorneys office, or the fact of the New York Police Commissioner that is now in prison, tell me some thing very good.

David S Johnson
Oct. 22, 2009
02:45 PM EDT
Great commentary, and the sad fact afraid it's true. But doesn't address the reason why. It is my belief that many Americans can and do recognize the difference. We are so very tired of our fourth estate not reporting just the facts, without any agenda most anything is worth the distraction. And when we are being distracted the very real news that is happing and will affect us we never even hear. It was why we trusted Walter, he didn't allow his politics or opinion enter in. If a news organization would go back to just reporting the facts and letting Americans develop their own opinions, imagine that news network would lead in all the ratings.

J. B. Silman
Oct. 22, 2009
05:00 PM EDT
I try to listen to both network and cable news. I must confess that I find network news so uninformative and totally consumed with the idea of promoting their liberal philosophy . Their newsprograms are reluctant to ever mention the serious problems associated with the current regime, the fact that the efforts have not produced a significant modicum of success in solving them. Our president is more concerned with exhibiting his profile than doing any thing. Network news brought us such things as Dan Rather(NOT) and his hysterical attack on George Bush with a forged letter( no attemp to verify the statements) and although relieved of his position continues to draw his salary. We have an admitted tax evader who said he did not understand the tax law running the Treasury, network news "a mere oversight" ??? what would happen to John Q. if he tried the same thing? Other bad choices abound but receive no publicity except when reported by Cable News. The comments in the article to which I am responding sound like the words of one of the "MESSIAH'S desciples on defending the three blind mice, CBS, NBCand ABC and their ofspring.

PEDRO CABRERA
Oct. 22, 2009
05:00 PM EDT
IF YOU NOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NEWS REPORTING AND POLITICAL PUNDITRY,HOW YOU CAN EXPLAIN THE NO COVERAGE OR UNDER COVERAGE OF THE MASSIVE MARCH TO THE CAPITOL IN DC THE LAST 9/12, HOW DO YOU ARE GOING TO JUSTIFY UNDER LOGIC THE NO COVERAGE OR POOR COVERAGE OF ONE THE MOST NUMEROUS MARCH IN THE COUNTRY IN MANY YEARS. HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY THE ABSENCE OF COVERAGE OF AN OVER 80 YEARS OLD PRIEST THAT WAS DETAINED IN NOTRE DAME WHEN PRESIDENT OBAMA VISITED THE UNIVERSITY,I CAN ADD MANY EXAMPLES, OF POOR COVERAGE, MISINFORMATION AND SIMPLY NO COVERAGE FROM THE NBC,MSNBC, CBS, CNN ABC, AND THE NEW YORK TIMES, WASHINGTON POST, AND MANY, MANY OTHERS NEWSPAPERS IN THE COUNTRY, SIMPLY FOX NEWS IS THE ONE WHO IS COVERING A PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH AND ALSO A PROTEST AGAINST THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THAT IS FREE PRESS, IF THE WHITE HOUSE LIKE OR NOT I AM SORRY, THE REAL PRESS IS NOT SUPPOSE TO WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT IT IS SUPPOSE TO INFORM ABOUT ALL THE ASPECTS AND ALL KIND OF NEWS TO THE PEOPLE, I WANT YOU TO ANALYZE THAT IF THIS IS HAPPENING IN THE COUNTRY NOW. WHY I CAN SEE A TEA PARTY PROTEST IN FOX AND NOT IN ABC AND THE OTHERS TV STATIONS WITH THE APPROPRIATE COVERAGE AND RESPECT FOR THE FREEDOM THAT CHARACTERIZED THE USA FOR MANY YEARS. I WANT FREEDOM I WANT TO SEE ALL THE NEWS IN ALL THE CHANNELS, IF A COMMENTATOR HAVE AN OPINION I WANT THAT COMMENTATOR TO FEEL FREE OF EXPRESSED IT. THAT IS THE MAIN REASON FOR ME TO CAME TO THE USA "FREEDOM". PEDRO CABRERA

VALETASUE JONES
Oct. 23, 2009
11:00 AM EDT
FOX NEWs ON THEIR WORSE DAY/NIGHT ARE BETTER ABOUT REPORTING THE NEWS AND WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO US THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAN ALL THE OTHERS PUT TOGETHER. MY OPINION!

russell
Oct. 23, 2009
11:00 AM EDT
i couldn't have put it better. you read my mind. great job.

PJ
Oct. 23, 2009
11:00 AM EDT
When it comes to free speech, It seems as if only the liberals are allowed to share there own view. I guess the rest of us are all just dumb asses that don't get it?

Ernest Toseland
Oct. 23, 2009
11:00 AM EDT
News should be facts, right on. Opinion should be noted as such. Where the problems come in are what stories are covered and how. Liberal meada just will not cover a story that does not agree with their point of veiw or if forced to cover a story they will infuse it with their side only. I want to hear all sides of a story so I can make up my mind thank GOD for Fox and a free talk raido so I can get the other side of the story and the storys the main streem will not carry. GOVERMENT BUTT OUT!!! We decide what we listen to hopefully not you.

shirley
Oct. 23, 2009
11:00 AM EDT
when is someone going to start the ball rolling to impeach obama. I cannot visualize another three years with him in the white house

L. Smith
Oct. 23, 2009
11:00 AM EDT
If the Whitehouse does not want Fox News to cover their press, so what they have a right. Fox News is so uninformative anyway. They report everything President Obama says in a negative light, even if it is right for the country.

Don Davidson
Oct. 23, 2009
11:00 AM EDT
Long lines in the Post Office, Stimulus Plan in and unemployment well over 8%, Promised 120 mil flu shoots & only 13 mil delivered ! the administration should focus on Afghanistan, trap funds and the above, rather than Fox News, but the president is only delivering the speachs that are written for him, he is not a THINKER !

Bill
Oct. 23, 2009
11:00 AM EDT
Meghan Harvey, so you drank from the B.O. fountain and the rest of the world can see that. If FOX is so far out there why did the NY Times just say they were wrong in not doing anything about the ACORN story? You folks have your heads so far us the "Left's ass" that you cannot see the daylight. The facts are that every story that FOX has run strikes a note with this administration because when your caught you get embarrassed and after so many problems they can't seem to get anything right (as seen by the recent polls that show them (the Dems) slipping on every issue. So, scream at the wind (as the Left likes to do) but shut up and start to actually report the news instead of trying to be the news. Or, maybe it is about time you change occupations and become more qualified than this president and become a fry person at the local McD's (no offence to those who do that job because to get there, you have to have more qualification than this president).

stopcryin
Oct. 26, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
I urge people to read about the "Institute for Propaganda Analisys" of 1938. Their report identifies several propaganda techniques, a few of which are blatantly used on the Fox pundit shows. Cable now has Oberman and Maddow, who regularly and efficiently expose Fox lies and inuendo. And the Fox pundits can't stand it.

James H. Solomon,II, PhD
Oct. 26, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
The issues you raise are not news. I recent read a book about Frank Lloyd Wright and Mamah Cheney. I was surprised about the newspaper articles written about their relationship. For most of us news equals emotions, not information, and clearly not facts. Reporters usually report in an emotional manner. Not factual manner. And given that very few of us have a balanced hand on our emotions, what do you expect. It takes a well emotionally balanced person ask some very simple questions: Why is so much being written about Obama and the Noble as opposed to trying to reduce starvation? Or why do we focus on what some public official is wearing vs improving public education? Maybe it has to do with our comfort zone and not wanting to really use that gray substance-called a brain-between our two ears.

valerie tassa
Oct. 26, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
If not for PBS, I'd have never heard of Brooksley Born, or the ' science' of creationism.

Cheryl Lynn
Oct. 26, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
Oh, you are a Democrat? Wow, hard to tell! Can you even imagine how much free for all propoganda would be slung at us if it weren't for FOX keeping the rest of the media just a tiny bit honest? Spin threaded into the newscasts? Have you listened to Wolfie or Gloria's little man lately? According to Wolf, the bad ol' Republicans wanted to deny the Democrats Teddy's last dying wish. When Wolf said that, it was absolutely, positively the very, very last time CNN will be on my T.V. As we all know, Senator Wonderful's dying wish was to put in Senator 60.

bp
Oct. 26, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
I thank it would be nice if we had a president that worked for the people and not fight all his personal problems in public. i wont a president that adhere to the constitution of the U S and not change it.

Michael Sullivan
Oct. 27, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
Mr. msskt, do you even realize that you stated that it is disturbing that FOX news is being attacked for being more conservative and at the end of that same paragraph you say they are the only ones attempting to be balanced. This sudden thought shift is common for FOX news viewers as they will sway in whichever direction FOX 'news' punditry blows. They disseminate opinion on current events through a Limbaugh-type filter and do not carry a journalism license. They are a glorified political talk show and its executives should be swiftly and harshly punished for allowing Bill O'Reilly to even speak.

Sylvester Billups
Oct. 28, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
Filibuster until I get situated. When I move to an apartment, so I can concentrate.

Pat G
Oct. 29, 2009
11:00 AM EDT
How could you ever think PBS as a news source that is not slanted? They are so far left sometimes I think they are really from another country.......

Vicki
Nov. 06, 2009
11:00 AM EST
Fox is a republican opinionated network. They spread the daily GOP talking points sprinkled with GOP hype, lies and misinformation. If you are a really warped right wing extremist republican you will believe every lie. The only one on Fox that is a real journalist is Shepard Smith.

Share your thoughts on the story by adding your comments below. Comments containing profanity, derogatory language, or any form of advertisement will not be approved. Comments will be reviewed by the site's editorial team, so your post may not appear for up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.

POST YOUR RESPONSE
 
 
Balance of Power

Track the United States government with updates on the three branches of government.

The Issues